tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9569781.post4568334598023764569..comments2023-10-31T08:44:39.596-05:00Comments on FENWAY PARK EFFECTS: THE CRISP/LUGO PROBLEMmattymattyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08291132296368578632noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9569781.post-21380914877530459922007-06-15T22:34:00.000-05:002007-06-15T22:34:00.000-05:00Thanks for the comment.Fair enough. I wasn't orig...Thanks for the comment.<BR/><BR/>Fair enough. I wasn't originally going to include EQA in my analysis, but I decided to after writing the majority of the post. I probably should have pulled out the "quick 'n dirty" line.<BR/><BR/>I subscribe to BP, so I'm pretty familiar with EQA and what components go into it, but thanks for the link just the same.mattymattyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08291132296368578632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9569781.post-87806842012604196002007-06-14T20:22:00.000-05:002007-06-14T20:22:00.000-05:00One note--EqA isn't exactly "quick and dirty"If yo...One note--EqA isn't exactly "quick and dirty"<BR/><BR/>If you check the glossary at Baseball Prospectus (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/glossary/index.php?search=eqa) you can read more about how it is calculated. It is scaled and spread so that it corresponds to the scale for batting average, but incorporates many more aspects of run production. It is meant to be convenient, but is not quick or dirty.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com